It's an Art Toy story,
It is also a story connected to the system and platform I want to create.
The area of art is compared to music
I thought that industrialization and division of labor did not go well.
It will have its pros and cons, but,
Shouldn't there be a change to have a greater impact and popularity?
No matter how noble and pure beauty art pursues
In the end, the public looked at it and liked it
I think it is meaningful to accept the artist's message.
What's the point of it if you complete the world's ultimate beauty and hide it at home?
When communicating with others, becoming symbols, and various interpretations and meanings are exchanged
Wouldn't art also have real value?
The art industry is a rather closed, large galleries and prestigious art galleries
And it's a stage for critics and writers.
That's why they say it's their own league, it's a playground for a few rich people.
Of course, there are a lot of attempts to break it these days
Attempts to add popularity, including pop art, are increasing.
Artists such as Damien Hirst and Jeff Koons continue to emerge.
I was thinking about Art Toy
I remembered that Cho Young-nam's masterpiece case went to the court a few years ago.
Most of the work was done by assistants, is this Cho Young-nam's work?
The fact that it became a problem
How backward the Korean art market is
It shows whether it is far from the global trend.
It shows what art is accepted by the public.
In modern times, art does not refer to paintings or sculptures already hanging on walls.
The artist's conception and philosophy for making paintings are the main focus
The process and performance of doing that is art
The result itself has long been a part of art.
Whether most of it was done by an assistant, by a robot or by a printer
That is not the point.
It is important why the writer planned, intended, and expressed it.
That's what happens,
Art works also come with various external help.
However, the problem is that all of those responsibilities and powers are concentrated only on one writer.
The gallery receives revenue from the sale or lease of the final result.
Many of the other supporters that the artist needed to work on were
You don't get paid for your efforts.
It's not just the financial part.
So-called professors, assistants, students, unknown supporters
Would that be enough if I got a financial reward??? It occurred to me that.
As well as monetary compensation for those who played a crucial role
I wonder if honor should go back together.
In the case of music, it is possible to set copyright for lyrics, composition, and arrangement separately.
And about the performance and singing, we put a clause in the copyright
You can receive an allocation whenever revenue is generated.
Actors also have running guarantees
Whenever there's additional advertising revenue from reruns of entertainment shows
The rebate is deposited into the cast.
Once, art left the artist's hands and went around the second and third secondary markets
Even if the price is hundreds of times, the artist cannot earn the profit together.
The distribution of efforts in the process of making the work is not included in copyright.
Shouldn't we reconsider the model for copyright and rights revenue distribution related to such artworks?
Even if you look at comic books, you distribute profits if the writers and writers are different.
It is believed that a stage should be created in which copyright can be registered separately by dividing the concept, production, installation, etc. of the painting.
This will enable more diverse collaborations.
The concept is a genius, but he's not good with his hands.
And someone who has a really crazy sense of color but can't take shape.
Through collaboration, various buried geniuses
You will be able to open up a new art genre.
The public will be happy to see more diverse beauty
Geniuses, who were reluctant to say that art is hungry, will begin to enter the art scene.
댓글
댓글 쓰기