Not long ago, I watched an animation called [Eden] on Netflix.
After humans went extinct due to environmental destruction,
It's an incident that happened while robots were living on Earth.
I won't tell the story so that I don't give out spoilers as much as possible.
There, robots say that humans should be defined as harmful to the earth and all should be eliminated.
That kind of development appears in a lot of content these days.
These days, AI is rapidly developing
It has become a situation where super-intelligent AI that goes beyond humans can come out next year.
As a result, humanity had a vague fear.
In a situation where AI, which is superior to humans, is dominating the world
In their judgment, humans destroy the environment of the Earth
If you think it's something that harms the diversity of other animals and plants
Wouldn't they then try to reduce humanity or make it completely extinct?
If I watch those contents, do humans really have to disappear?
No, it's not that bad
Is it right that disappearing will improve the lives of other plants and animals?
I think you should think about what life is before asking those questions.
In the end, it's an extension of utilitarianism
The happiness of more creatures when humans are gone
The logic is that you have to make sacrifices because there is an absolute majority of happiness.
What is life and what is happiness.
You should also consider whether it is really worthwhile.
on one's own terms
Life, as we developed AI as we advanced the computation of computers
It's an organism that understands the behavior patterns of more organisms
In the process of evolving into a favorable state for survival, the development of the brain is advanced
I think consciousness is a pattern that is not much different from AI.
Whether the vessel is a connection of semiconductors,
It's just the difference between organic matter and neurons.
I don't think there is a soul or a separate spirit in life.
It is close to a materialistic position.
If that's the case, our environmental degradation is just statistically possible
It's just one of the chemical and physical interactions.
The judgment on whether it is right or wrong is not
It's just a very human and human way of thinking.
If we really have advanced AI
After studying all the physics, chemistry, astrophysics, and so on
Just as humans have classified animals and insects
Separating insect pests from pests?
There was no such thing in the first place.
It's just a standard created by humans.
The universe does not judge.
There is no god who judges.
There are only people who want to be judged or who want to judge others.
Lightning strikes from the sky, no different from what we believe is God's punishment
It is just a judgment from a typical human point of view.
The black hole absorbs the stars and planets around it and breaks them all down
Is Black Hole an Evil?
Black or something to be removed?
Humans also exist, and there is no reason to use the standards of good and evil.
Whether they kill themselves by their own mistakes or not
It's just a movement about the species' limits and cycles.
I think AI will make judgments beyond human perception to that extent.
So I think human hunting and extinction planning by AI are issues that need not be worried.
The end! Today's diary is kind of like a writer?
댓글
댓글 쓰기